[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#489878: marked as done (diald: [INTL:vi] Vietnamese debconf templates translation)



Your message dated Sun, 13 Jul 2008 07:02:03 +0000
with message-id <E1KHvat-00067v-E3@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#489878: fixed in diald 0.99.4-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #489878,
regarding diald: [INTL:vi] Vietnamese debconf templates translation
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
489878: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=489878
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: diald
Version:
Tags:  l10n patch
Severity: wishlist

The initial Vietnamese translation for the debconf file: diald

translated and submitted by:

Clytie Siddall
Vietnamese Free-Software Translation Team
http://vnoss.net/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=projects:l10n

Attachment: vi.po
Description: Binary data


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: diald
Source-Version: 0.99.4-9

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
diald, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

diald_0.99.4-9.diff.gz
  to pool/main/d/diald/diald_0.99.4-9.diff.gz
diald_0.99.4-9.dsc
  to pool/main/d/diald/diald_0.99.4-9.dsc
diald_0.99.4-9_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/diald/diald_0.99.4-9_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 489878@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org> (supplier of updated diald package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:10:27 +0200
Source: diald
Binary: diald
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.99.4-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
Description: 
 diald      - dial on demand daemon for PPP and SLIP
Closes: 452949 487597 489453 489878 490197 490342 490616
Changes: 
 diald (0.99.4-9) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload to fix pending l10n issues.
   * Debconf translations:
     - Dutch. Closes: #452949
     - Swedish. Closes: #487597
     - Galician. Closes: #489453
     - Vietnamese. Closes: #489878
     - Basque. Closes: #490197
     - Russian. Closes: #490342
     - Finnish. Closes: #490616
Checksums-Sha1: 
 91aecc66ba9998e69436ba3408b3eeed0cfee3dd 985 diald_0.99.4-9.dsc
 c5ea42114a0dd946ef2259aa00546251d960529c 42492 diald_0.99.4-9.diff.gz
 8e2d561453e881701504a50538cc92fdf59146d7 184394 diald_0.99.4-9_i386.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 f20eea7c81541c9d984602dac90a3b216c4349ccef1dad4b6019eb153aa2eac5 985 diald_0.99.4-9.dsc
 10736c65f1b5f893de9fc2007019130ae3f0486410d09d19e814aed3588e1e79 42492 diald_0.99.4-9.diff.gz
 1c837cff78487ca2849228fc28fe362429a8dcb1f544372b300350bef5ffe028 184394 diald_0.99.4-9_i386.deb
Files: 
 07779a07b0baef0bb715e71ee59b0774 985 net optional diald_0.99.4-9.dsc
 2f51e7b0b3c84b749cb9a1240164c390 42492 net optional diald_0.99.4-9.diff.gz
 95073d011a9c8740542fa36e5633d85d 184394 net optional diald_0.99.4-9_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkh5oXsACgkQ1OXtrMAUPS2awQCeKHPcPd0VE1lq4FzVFhGOLU15
qnUAn3YQCcsSuMWdU0qjaH+0yeP+I7wi
=HmYs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---

Reply to: