[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#186311: marked as done (gtk-engines-xenophilia: gtk2 version)

Your message dated Thu, 29 May 2008 14:50:17 +0100
with message-id <200805291350.m4TDoHo0010746@kmos.homeip.net>
and subject line xenophilia has been removed from Debian, closing #186311
has caused the Debian Bug report #186311,
regarding gtk-engines-xenophilia: gtk2 version
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org

186311: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=186311
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gtk-engines-xenophilia
Version: 0.8-1
Severity: wishlist

this is very wishlist, but a gtk2 version of this theme would be nice, 
since gtk2 uses different rc files, with some formatting differences.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux newdesk 2.4.20 #2 Sat Jan 25 10:40:47 EST 2003 i686

Versions of packages gtk-engines-xenophilia depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.3.1-14   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libglib1.2                    1.2.10-8   The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk1.2                     1.2.10-14  The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  xlibs                         4.2.1-3    X Window System client libraries
ii  xutils                        4.2.1-3    X Window System utility programs

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.8-3+rm

The xenophilia package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.

For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/352593 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.

Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.

Thank you for your contribution to Debian.

Marco Rodrigues

--- End Message ---

Reply to: