Your message dated Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:55:10 +0530 with message-id <a0c4f6270712130525o413d3e77n7aef5b806d3fd2d9@mail.gmail.com> and subject line Bug#456120: entity -- Please transition to imlib2 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: entity -- Please transition to imlib2
- From: Kumar Appaiah <akumar@ee.iitm.ac.in>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:29:28 +0530
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20071213075928.GA22385@debian.akumar.iitm.ac.in>
Package: entity Version: 1.0.1-9 User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org Usertags: oldlibs oldlibs-imlib Hi! On behalf of the QA group, I have been looking at packages which are blocking the removal of libraries currently in the section oldlibs, and entity is one of them, depending on imlib. With the aim of fixing as many of the depending as possible to pave the way for gradual removal of imlib, I would request you to consider moving to imlib2. Thanks. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600 036Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: "Peter Pentchev" <roam@ringlet.net>
- Cc: "Kumar Appaiah" <akumar@ee.iitm.ac.in>, 456120-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#456120: entity -- Please transition to imlib2
- From: "Kumar Appaiah" <kumar.appaiah@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:55:10 +0530
- Message-id: <a0c4f6270712130525o413d3e77n7aef5b806d3fd2d9@mail.gmail.com>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20071213110833.GB1848@straylight.m.ringlet.net>
- References: <[🔎] 20071213075928.GA22385@debian.akumar.iitm.ac.in> <[🔎] 20071213110833.GB1848@straylight.m.ringlet.net>
Version: 1.0.1-9 On 13/12/2007, Peter Pentchev wrote: > Erm, wasn't "entity" removed a couple of days ago? > > Or am I misunderstanding something in the way Debian package removals > are handled? :) This is quite possible, actually. What you have misunderstood is the way _people_ who handle the packages goof it up, and how more aware people like you point out the mistakes quickly! Thanks for pointing this out, and sorry for the incorrect bug. Kumar -- Kumar Appaiah, 458, Jamuna Hostel, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai - 600036
--- End Message ---