[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#450474: marked as done (tclex: FTBFS: ./configure: line 615: /usr/share/lib/tcl8.4/tclConfig.sh: No such file or directory)

Your message dated Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:32:11 +0000
with message-id <E1IyBat-0004ud-Eb@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#450474: fixed in tclex 1.2a1-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--- Begin Message ---
Package: tclex
version: 1.2a1-11
Severity: serious
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20071106 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on i386


During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on i386.

Relevant part:
dpkg-source: building tclex in tclex_1.2a1-11.dsc
 debian/rules build
cd src; chmod +x configure; ./configure; 
creating cache ./config.cache
setting prefix to: /usr/share
checking for a BSD compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c
./configure: line 615: /usr/share/lib/tcl8.4/tclConfig.sh: No such file or directory
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2

The full build log is available from

A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at 
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!

About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot containing a sid i386
environment.  Internet was not accessible from the build systems.

| Lucas Nussbaum
| lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net   http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lucas@nussbaum.fr             GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: tclex
Source-Version: 1.2a1-12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tclex, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

  to pool/main/t/tclex/tclex_1.2a1-12.diff.gz
  to pool/main/t/tclex/tclex_1.2a1-12.dsc
  to pool/main/t/tclex/tclex_1.2a1-12_i386.deb

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 450474@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
Sergei Golovan <sgolovan@debian.org> (supplier of updated tclex package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)

Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 20:41:40 +0300
Source: tclex
Binary: tclex
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2a1-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Tcl/Tk Debian Packagers <pkg-tcltk-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Sergei Golovan <sgolovan@debian.org>
 tclex      - A lexical analyzer generator for Tcl
Closes: 406135 450474
 tclex (1.2a1-12) unstable; urgency=low
   * New maintainer Debian Tcl/Tk Packagers
     <pkg-tcltk-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org> (closes: #406135).
   * Adopted the package to the current Debian Tcl/Tk policy. This also fixed
     FTBFS (closes: #450474).
   * Fixed lintian complain on ignoring make distclean errors.
   * Switched to quilt for patch management.
   * Bumped debhelper compatibility level to 5.
 7767040dafbbb590549e499bd4c94e29 651 interpreters extra tclex_1.2a1-12.dsc
 b78a8c43b9b6207162d24a135deeb51e 6967 interpreters extra tclex_1.2a1-12.diff.gz
 e5f87021c1f80eac33318b44e3ec1a1a 47056 interpreters extra tclex_1.2a1-12_i386.deb

Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)


--- End Message ---

Reply to: