Bug#421640: please provide unifont.hex
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 10:42:59AM +0200, Matej Vela wrote:
> Robert Millan <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > Uhm, for an orphaned package, I suppose I have to do this myself. Are there
> > any rules I should take into consideration before NMUing?
> Basically, all maintainers are encouraged to do uploads on behalf of the
> QA Group, and you can treat it as a maintainer upload. I.e. no NMU diff,
> no point revisions (1:1.0-4 rather than 1:1.0-3.1), as many changes as you
> feel necessary, and new upstream versions if practical. It's customary to
> put "QA upload" in the first line of the changelog.
> > Also, could someone please review my patch and tell me if it's ok?
> Perhaps a separate package would be better (unifont-source?). It would
> double the size of the existing package, and the vast majority of current
> users don't need it.
Then I think I'll follow what #62356 suggests, call it "unifont-bin", and add
hexdraw as well.
> It's worth mentioning in the description that the Yudit editor digs .hex
> fonts. You might want to check whether it accepts compressed files, and
> leave unifont.hex uncompressed if not.
It doesn't. Will leave uncompressed then.
> > Using /usr/share/fonts seems like the right thing to me, but there
> > aren't other packages adding their own formats there (perhaps
> > /usr/share/unifont would be better?).
> yudit-common has /usr/share/yudit/fonts/yudit.hex, so I'd go for
My spam trap is email@example.com. Note: this address is only intended
for spam harvesters. Writing to it will get you added to my black list.