[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: question about unmaintained packages



ok, thanks, I'll contact MIA ;)

David.


Jeroen van Wolffelaar a écrit :

>On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 04:09:50PM +0200, David Cho-Lerat wrote:
>  
>
>>Hello all,
>>
>>I'm new to this list so please bear with me, as I suppose this
>>question has already been asked (possibly many times) :
>>
>>what happens when a package maintainer does not seem to maintain
>>his/her packages anymore ?
>>    
>>
>
>This is eventually noted by the MIA effort of QA, possibly helped by
>hints from users/other developers/whoever.
>
>  
>
>>Do the packages remain in a possibly broken state for an undefined
>>amount of time ?
>>    
>>
>
>Yes.
> 
>  
>
>>Are they re-assigned to another DD ?
>>    
>>
>
>Ultimately, yes.
> 
>  
>
>>Is there any automated process that checks how long a bug has been open
>>in the BTS ? I've come across bugs that are almost four years old ..
>>    
>>
>
>Not for bugs in particular, but every DD can fix a bug when s/he really
>wants by NMU'ing the package in question with a fix. If no DD has done
>so far, none of them cares enough to spend the time on it, or either are
>simply not aware. Debian is and remains an organisation of volunteers.
> 
>  
>
>>I have lately submitted a bug report, sent an e-mail to the package
>>maintainer, and am ready
>>to submit a patch for the bug I've spotted, but there has been no
>>acknowledgment so
>>far from the maintainer, so I'm at a loss what to do next ..
>>    
>>
>
>Ask on debian-qa or to mia@qa.debian.org about this specific package
>and/or maintainer, the situation will be investigated, and action
>undertaken (usually, the maintainer is asked for comments, and one acts
>on the reaction or either ultimately puts up the package for adoption by
>anyone interested.
>
>So, in general, mail mia@qa.debian.org privately when you're concerned a
>certain package is unmaintained, or better if possible, offer your
>assistance to the maintainer and see if that works. Filing patches is
>always a good way to do so.
> 
>--Jeroen
>
>  
>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: