[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Adopting dutch dicts + emacs21: ispell.el and dictionnary list

reassign 314622 aspell-nl
close    314622 1:0.1e-38
merge    314622 329181

On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 04:49:08PM +0200, Agustin Martin wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 12:30:16PM +0200, Pascal A. Dupuis wrote:
> > To get aspell-nl properly registred, I did the following:
> > 
> > 1) extract the file idutch from package idutch, found under
> >    /var/lib/dictionaries-common/ispell
> > 2) copied it as /var/lib/dictionnaries-common/aspell/aspell-nl
> > 3) ran /usr/sbin/update-dictcommon-aspell
> > 
> > So, what's missing:
> > - the proper dictionnary definition aspell-nl
> > - postinst and postrm scripts which update the aspell dict list
> > 
> Thanks for taking a look at this. 
> You are right in the steps, but is better to add this in aspell-nl package
> directly. dutch dicts are currently orphaned,
> http://bugs.debian.org/314839
> I already mailed the two interested persons about patches I had nearly
> ready for dutch dicts, one will deal only with registration and the other
> will also deal with affix compression (available for aspell 0.60). This
> second revealed some possible inconsistencies in the wordlist that might be
> of interest upstream. I am cc'ing these two persons now.
> I will reassign this bugreport to aspell-nl as soon as it has a new
> maintainer, I do not want to put noise on QA people in the meantime. If
> nodoby finally takes the package I will take it temporarily until finds a
> better (dutch speaking) home.

The companion bug report

[#329181: aspell-nl: fails to interface properly to emacs]

has been closed by a QA upload, so I am reassigning this bug report to
aspell-nl, closing it as of aspell-nl 1:0.1e-38 and merging it with

Thanks for your feedback.

[QA team, nothing else is required on your side]



Reply to: