[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#329334: marked as done (acl-alisp8: bug in alisp8.sh?)



Your message dated Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:12:43 +0200
with message-id <873bnyfadg.fsf@diziet.irb.hr>
and subject line Bug#329334: acl-alisp8: bug in alisp8.sh?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 08:09:01 +0000
>From frido@q-software-solutions.de Wed Sep 21 01:09:01 2005
Return-path: <frido@q-software-solutions.de>
Received: from 213-239-199-47.clients.your-server.de (mail.q-software-solutions.de) [213.239.199.47] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EHzf3-0007pi-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 01:09:01 -0700
Received: from p54a37765.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.163.119.101] helo=flarge.here)
	by mail.q-software-solutions.de with asmtp (Exim 4.34)
	id 1EHzeu-0004pk-3V
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:08:59 +0200
Received: from frido by flarge.here with local (Exim 4.50)
	id 1EHzeO-0003CK-Ds
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:08:20 +0200
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
From: Friedrich Dominicus <frido@q-software-solutions.de>
Organization: Q Software Solutions GmbH
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:08:20 +0200
Message-ID: <8764suetcb.fsf@flarge.here>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Jumbo Shrimp, linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 84.163.119.101
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: frido@q-software-solutions.de
Subject: acl-alisp8: bug in alisp8.sh?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.1 (built Tue, 17 Aug 2004 11:06:07 +0200)
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.q-software-solutions.de)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: acl-alisp8
Version: 6.2.32
Severity: normal

I found the following in that file 

case $1 in
    rebuild)
	echo $0 Rebuilding packages...
	shift
	while [ -x $acl_dir/$lisp_builder -a ! -z "$1" ] ; do
	    echo ...rebuilding $1
	    /usr/bin/$lisp_target -q -batch -L $acl_dir/siteinit.cl -e "
(let ((*compile-print* nil)
      (*compile-progress* nil)
      (*compile-verbose*  nil)
      (*require-verbose* nil)
      (*load-verbose* nil))

with high likliness you do not want to have 
/usr/bin/$lisp_target but $acl_dir/$lisp_builder why should one check
for an executable file in the while if one does not use it. If one
installed AllegroCL.

If that is still correct how should one know that there should be e.g
a /usr/bin/alisp8 ?

Regards
Friedrich


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages acl-alisp8 depends on:
ii  acl-pro-installer             6.2.32     Installer for Franz' Allegro 6.2 L
ii  common-lisp-controller        4.18       This is a Common Lisp source and c

Versions of packages acl-alisp8 recommends:
ii  acldoc-el                     6.2.32     Display AllegroCL documentation fr

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 329334-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2005 20:12:32 +0000
>From mvela@irb.hr Wed Sep 21 13:12:31 2005
Return-path: <mvela@irb.hr>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EIAxD-0003qi-00; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:12:31 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
	by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j8LKCMXk002871
	for <329334-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:12:22 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j8LKChps014373
	for <329334-done@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:12:43 +0200
Received: (from mvela@localhost)
	by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id j8LKCh4X014371;
	Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:12:43 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: diziet.irb.hr: mvela set sender to mvela@irb.hr using -f
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 329334-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#329334: acl-alisp8: bug in alisp8.sh?
References: <8764suetcb.fsf@flarge.here>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 22:12:43 +0200
In-Reply-To: <8764suetcb.fsf@flarge.here> (Friedrich Dominicus's message of
	"Wed, 21 Sep 2005 10:08:20 +0200")
Message-ID: <873bnyfadg.fsf@diziet.irb.hr>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
Delivered-To: 329334-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Hello,

Unfortunately, acl-installer was removed from Debian in July because no
one was interested in maintaining it (http://bugs.debian.org/317416).

Thanks,

Matej



Reply to: