[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#257010: marked as done (xmms: Default skin is user-hostile )

Your message dated Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:17:15 -0700
with message-id <E1EH6XD-0008UJ-00@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#257010: fixed in xmms 1.2.10+cvs20050809-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jun 2004 13:15:20 +0000
>From era@there.afraid.org Wed Jun 30 06:15:20 2004
Return-path: <era@there.afraid.org>
Received: from rhols66.adsl.netsonic.fi (there.afraid.org) [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Bfevo-0002GX-00; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 06:15:20 -0700
Received: by there.afraid.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id E642D15AA6F; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:19:49 +0300 (EEST)
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: xmms: Default skin is user-hostile 
X-Debbugs-CC: era eriksson <era+debian@iki.fi>
From: era eriksson <era@iki.fi>
Message-Id: <20040630131949.E642D15AA6F@there.afraid.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:19:49 +0300 (EEST)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,
	X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25

Package: xmms
Version: 1.2.10-1
Severity: wishlist

The "none" skin which XMMS displays by default is virtually unusable
for me, and I have reasonably good eyesight.

I'm sure it's very "cool" to emulate a low-contrast blue LED on black
plastic in an obscure lounge, but for those of us who just want to see
the name of the song we're listening to occasionally, and not be
particularly cool, it would be very useful indeed to include a
different skin, perhaps as an alternative, in the base package.

I'm aware of xmms-skins and am personally using a skin from that
add-on package, but I wouldn't bet a naive user would even understand
the meaning of "skin", and if you don't have any alternative skins
installed, they're not going to find out by playing around.

Only two of the alternatives in xmms-skins have a reasonable contrast
(specifically, Helix-Sawfish and minEguE) and it could be better still
-- a trivial black on white skin should be fairly simple to hack up
and not take a lot of room in the package.

I guess technical constraints prevent skins from using proper case
instead of HIDEOUS UPPER CASE in the song title when XMMS is minimized
so I won't bother to issue a separate bug report about that ...

Thanks for considering this,

/* era */

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux back 2.4.18-bf2.4 #1 Son Apr 14 09:53:28 CEST 2002 i586 unknown

Received: (at 257010-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Sep 2005 21:23:02 +0000
>From katie@spohr.debian.org Sun Sep 18 14:23:02 2005
Return-path: <katie@spohr.debian.org>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EH6XD-0008UJ-00; Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:17:15 -0700
From: David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>
To: 257010-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#257010: fixed in xmms 1.2.10+cvs20050809-2
Message-Id: <E1EH6XD-0008UJ-00@spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@spohr.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 14:17:15 -0700
Delivered-To: 257010-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: xmms
Source-Version: 1.2.10+cvs20050809-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xmms, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

  to pool/main/x/xmms/xmms-dev_1.2.10+cvs20050809-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/x/xmms/xmms_1.2.10+cvs20050809-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/x/xmms/xmms_1.2.10+cvs20050809-2.dsc
  to pool/main/x/xmms/xmms_1.2.10+cvs20050809-2_i386.deb

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 257010@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org> (supplier of updated xmms package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)

Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 12:41:32 -0500
Source: xmms
Binary: xmms-dev xmms
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.2.10+cvs20050809-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>
Changed-By: David Moreno Garza <damog@debian.org>
 xmms       - Versatile X audio player
 xmms-dev   - XMMS development static library and header files
Closes: 254436 257010 292878 327561
 xmms (1.2.10+cvs20050809-2) unstable; urgency=low
   * New maintainer (Closes: #327561).
   * Added priority = 3 on x-wav mime (Closes: #254436).
   * Added a nice default skin (Closes: #257010, #292878).
 596cb96b31a5951cbe7579e6b8c2ecad 913 sound optional xmms_1.2.10+cvs20050809-2.dsc
 3a4abf78b7cef8bbfc06cfe6cac2bfe0 179420 sound optional xmms_1.2.10+cvs20050809-2.diff.gz
 1b005b9f99dbc9a20b685a74f2358fbb 2406086 sound optional xmms_1.2.10+cvs20050809-2_i386.deb
 8365813b4bbc52d9fd585b2654814ea9 33522 devel optional xmms-dev_1.2.10+cvs20050809-2_i386.deb

Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)


Reply to: