Bug#269564: marked as done (doomlegacy-sdl: Crashes on startup with undefined symbol error)
Your message dated Sat, 11 Jun 2005 07:00:10 +0200
with message-id <20050611050009.GN24634@djpig.de>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Sep 2004 08:00:30 +0000
>From luke@neuro-tech.net Thu Sep 02 01:00:30 2004
Return-path: <luke@neuro-tech.net>
Received: from 133.183.210.220.dy.bbexcite.jp (flux) [220.210.183.133]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C2mWE-0003CW-00; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 01:00:30 -0700
Received: from luke by flux with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1C2mWC-0005H6-00; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 17:00:28 +0900
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Luke Reeves <luke@neuro-tech.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: doomlegacy-sdl: Crashes on startup with undefined symbol error
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 17:00:28 +0900
Message-Id: <E1C2mWC-0005H6-00@flux>
Sender: Luke Reeves <luke@flux>
X-BadReturnPath: luke@flux rewritten as luke@neuro-tech.net
using "From" header
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: doomlegacy-sdl
Version: 1.41release-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
When trying to start the "lsdldoom" binary (using either the shareware
or the real Doom WAD files), it crashes with the message:
lsdldoom: relocation error: lsdldoom: undefined symbol: open_music
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8.1
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages doomlegacy-sdl depends on:
ii doomlegacy-data 1.41release-1 Data files needed by doomlegacy
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libsdl-mixer1.2 1.2.5-8 mixer library for Simple DirectMed
ii libsdl1.2debian 1.2.7-7 Simple DirectMedia Layer
ii xlibmesa-gl [libgl1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 Mesa 3D graphics library [XFree86]
ii xlibmesa-glu [libglu1] 4.3.0.dfsg.1-6 Mesa OpenGL utility library [XFree
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 269564-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jun 2005 05:00:15 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Fri Jun 10 22:00:15 2005
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Dgy6R-0000bh-00; Fri, 10 Jun 2005 22:00:15 -0700
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Dgy6M-00018p-Ns
for 269564-done@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2005 07:00:11 +0200
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 07:00:10 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
To: 269564-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Fixed
Message-ID: <20050611050009.GN24634@djpig.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: 269564-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This bug was fixed some time ago in doomlegacy-sdl 1.41release-2.
Closing
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Reply to: