[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#270715: marked as done (bug report)



Your message dated Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
with message-id <E1D1Tjq-0002Lk-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#270715: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Sep 2004 20:27:52 +0000
>From eva.schmidt2@uni.de Wed Sep 08 13:27:52 2004
Return-path: <eva.schmidt2@uni.de>
Received: from basket.ball.reliam.net [213.91.6.7] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1C592m-00087c-00; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 13:27:52 -0700
Received: from pit.ID-43118.user.dfncis.de (A0984.a.pppool.de [213.6.9.132])
	by basket.ball.reliam.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA22E3D97
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed,  8 Sep 2004 22:27:19 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from grfz by pit.ID-43118.user.dfncis.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1C592E-0003gj-00; Wed, 08 Sep 2004 22:27:18 +0200
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 22:27:18 +0200
From: Gregor Zattler <texmex@uni.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: bug report
Message-ID: <20040908202718.GD2602@pit.ID-43118.user.dfncis.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040818i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Subject: wish: add more file name extensions to "--no-compression-regexp" default regex
Package: rdiff-backup
Severity: wishlist

*** Please type your report below this line ***

Please add at least the following file name extensions to the
default regexp for --no-compression-regexp:

pgp     default file name extension for pgp encrypted data or
	signatures 
gpg     default file name extension for gpg encrypted data or
        signatures 
flac    default file name extension for lossless audio codec
rz      default rzip file name extension
lzh     default file name extension for ancient archiver and packer
zoo     default file name extension for ancient archiver and packer
lharc   default file name extension for ancient archiver and packer
rar     default file name extension for archiver and packer 
arj     default file name extension for archiver and packer
jpeg    imho there are not only .jpg file name extensions
        but also .jpeg

Thus the default would be:

"(?i).*\.(gz|z|bz|bz2|tgz|zip|lzh|zoo|lharc|rar|rz|arj|rpm|deb|pgp|gpg|jpeg|jpg|gif|png|jp2|mp3|flac|ogg|avi|wmv|mpeg|mpg|rm|mov)$"












-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-rc3
Locale: LANG=de_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 270715-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2005 18:23:06 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Wed Feb 16 10:23:06 2005
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1D1TpK-0000l4-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:23:06 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1D1Tjq-0002Lk-00; Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
From: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net>
To: 270715-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#270715: fixed in rdiff-backup 0.13.4-4
Message-Id: <E1D1Tjq-0002Lk-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:17:26 -0500
Delivered-To: 270715-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 9

Source: rdiff-backup
Source-Version: 0.13.4-4

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
rdiff-backup, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.diff.gz
rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.dsc
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.dsc
rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 270715@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net> (supplier of updated rdiff-backup package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:29:00 +0100
Source: rdiff-backup
Binary: rdiff-backup
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.13.4-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net>
Changed-By: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@panthera-systems.net>
Description: 
 rdiff-backup - incremental backups using binary deltas
Closes: 225471 225485 235875 241906 252960 256266 260018 261578 270715 277044
Changes: 
 rdiff-backup (0.13.4-4) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New maintainer (Closes: #261578).
   * Took over Alec Berrymans <alec@thened.net> interim package.
   * debian/* redone and updated to new policy.
   * debian/control: added correct python depency (Closes: #252960).
   * Added rdiff-backup-hardlinks.dpatch to insure flag '--no-hard-links' is not
     overridden by filesystem abilities and to fix handling of hard links on Mac
     OS X (Thanks to Dave Vasilevsky <djvasi@gmail.com>).
   * Added typo-fix.dpatch to fix an error message typo (Thanks to Thomas Jarosch
     <thomas.jarosch@intra2net.com>).
   * Added patch from CVS to fix broken '--calculate-average' flag (Thanks to
     Dean Gaudet <dean@arctic.org>, Closes: #241906, #225471, #225485).
   * Patched hard link test with afs-hardlinks.dpatch to only enable hard links
     if able to link across directories. AFS only allows hard links within a
     directory (Closes: #260018).
   * Patched error message thrown when invoking after an unsuccessful backup with
     typo-fix-2.dpatch (Closes: #256266).
   * Added patch backup_warn_if_infinite_regress.dpatch backported from CVS to
     fix handling of destination directory as subdirectories of source directory
     (Closes: #235875).
   * Patched types of files not to be compressed with no-compress-regexp.dpatch
     (Closes: #270715).
   * Added patch restrict-read-only.dpatch to correct the behavior of the
     '--restrict-read-only' flag to bring it in line with the documented behavior
     (Thanks to Dean Gaudet <dean@arctic.org>, Closes: #277044).
Files: 
 a06092300c15b2b5530eebe828eade39 724 utils optional rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.dsc
 ba4818732f83a92a3acd4decd2b6ddba 7849 utils optional rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4.diff.gz
 22d0f5daf9a6aa93b2951787602ed375 31142 utils optional rdiff-backup_0.13.4-4_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkITitEACgkQELuA/Ba9d8YH1wCfXAwt4u5eegUuRqnWTdLYSPJJ
+xQAoNuMS3J1wFf4HOmYEW/VTZ6GtNc9
=8Zcw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: