Bug#208370: marked as done (iceme: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends)
Your message dated 10 Aug 2004 00:39:11 -0700
with message-id <87llgnl9wg.fsf@becket.becket.net>
and subject line bugs done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Sep 2003 13:05:56 +0000
>From daniel@frobnitz.ddts.net Tue Sep 02 08:05:54 2003
Return-path: <daniel@frobnitz.ddts.net>
Received: from barry.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.25]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19uAr4-0003wu-00; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 08:05:54 -0500
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz)
by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
id 19uAr3-0002HI-00
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 09:05:54 -0400
Received: from daniel by frobnitz with local (Exim 4.22)
id 19uAqe-0001Th-IP
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 02 Sep 2003 06:05:28 -0700
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: iceme: FTBFS: Missing Build-Depends
From: Daniel Schepler <schepler@math.berkeley.edu>
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 06:05:28 -0700
Message-ID: <87wucrjq7b.fsf@frobnitz.ddts.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Daniel Schepler <daniel@frobnitz.ddts.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: iceme
Version: 1.0.0-11
Severity: serious
>From my build log:
...
dh_compress
dh_fixperms
dh_python
Use of uninitialized value in string at /usr/bin/dh_python line 78.
dh_python: Python is not installed, aborting. (Probably forgot to Build-Depend on python.)
make: *** [binary-indep] Error 1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux frobnitz 2.6.0-test4 #1 Thu Aug 28 00:56:57 PDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
--
Daniel Schepler "Please don't disillusion me. I
schepler@math.berkeley.edu haven't had breakfast yet."
-- Orson Scott Card
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 208370-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2004 07:39:12 +0000
>From tb@becket.net Tue Aug 10 00:39:12 2004
Return-path: <tb@becket.net>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BuRE0-0006bz-00; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:39:12 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BuRDz-0005RX-NN; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:39:11 -0700
To: 208370-done@bugs.debian.org, 208115-done@bugs.debian.org,
207595-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: bugs done
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Windows: It could be worse, but it'll take time.
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Date: 10 Aug 2004 00:39:11 -0700
Message-ID: <87llgnl9wg.fsf@becket.becket.net>
Lines: 4
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 208370-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3
These bugs were fixed in NMUs 1.0.0-11.1, and 1.0.0-11, and accepted
when QA took the package at 1.0.0-12.
Reply to: