[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#202884: marked as done (Depends on unavailable version of glibc)



Your message dated 10 Aug 2004 00:37:57 -0700
with message-id <87pt5zl9yi.fsf@becket.becket.net>
and subject line bugs done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jul 2003 20:27:33 +0000
>From chip@tytlal.perlsupport.com Fri Jul 25 15:27:31 2003
Return-path: <chip@tytlal.perlsupport.com>
Received: from tandu.perlsupport.com [66.220.6.226] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19g9A3-00017y-00; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 15:27:31 -0500
Received: from tytlal.hmsonline.com
	([207.43.94.202] helo=tytlal ident=mail)
	by tandu.perlsupport.com with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19g9A2-0008K7-00; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 13:27:30 -0700
Received: from chip by tytlal with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19g9A3-00005B-00; Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:27:31 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Chip Salzenberg <chip@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Depends on unavailable version of glibc
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2003 16:27:31 -0400
Message-Id: <E19g9A3-00005B-00@tytlal>
Sender: Chip Salzenberg <chip@tytlal.perlsupport.com>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: loadlin
Version: 1.6c-0.2
Severity: serious
Tags: sid

The loadlin in sid depends on glibc 2.3.2 which isn't in sid.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux tytlal 2.4.22pre7aa1 #1 Sat Jul 19 13:50:17 EDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages loadlin depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.3.1-17   GNU C Library: Shared libraries an

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 202884-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2004 07:37:57 +0000
>From tb@becket.net Tue Aug 10 00:37:57 2004
Return-path: <tb@becket.net>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BuRCn-0006TL-00; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:37:57 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BuRCn-0005Qo-2U; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:37:57 -0700
To: 202884-done@bugs.debian.org, 123203-done@bugs.debian.org,
        163098-done@bugs.debian.org, 194825-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: bugs done
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
		 permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51  63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E  EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Windows: The joke that kills.
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Date: 10 Aug 2004 00:37:57 -0700
Message-ID: <87pt5zl9yi.fsf@becket.becket.net>
Lines: 4
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 202884-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4


These bugs were fixed in NMUs 1.6c-0.3, 1.6c-0.2, 1.6c-0.1, and
accepted when the package was taken by QA in version 1.6c-0.4.



Reply to: