Bug#207595: marked as done (iceme: doesn't install without python2.2)
Your message dated 10 Aug 2004 00:39:11 -0700
with message-id <87llgnl9wg.fsf@becket.becket.net>
and subject line bugs done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 2003 06:40:41 +0000
>From ulmo@garozzo.franken.de Thu Aug 28 01:40:38 2003
Return-path: <ulmo@garozzo.franken.de>
Received: from mail-n.franken.de [193.175.24.27]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19sGSS-00070H-00; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 01:40:36 -0500
Received: from garozzo.franken.de (garozzo.franken.de [193.174.159.28])
by mail-n.franken.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E706A24668
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 08:40:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ulmo by garozzo.franken.de with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19sGSp-0007hU-00; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 08:40:59 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
From: Bernd Sokolowsky <debian@garozzo.franken.de>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: iceme: doesn't install without python2.2
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.24
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 08:40:51 +0200
Message-Id: <E19sGSp-0007hU-00@garozzo.franken.de>
Sender: Bernd Sokolowsky <ulmo@garozzo.franken.de>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: iceme
Version: 1.0.0-10
Severity: normal
python2.3 is named in iceme's Depends: line, but without python2.2 it doesn't install:
# apt-get -f install
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 581 not upgraded.
1 packages not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B of archives.
After unpacking 0B of additional disk space will be used.
Lese Changelogs... Fertig
Setting up iceme (1.0.0-10) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/iceme.postinst: line 14: python2.2: command not found
dpkg: error processing iceme (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127
Errors were encountered while processing:
iceme
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux garozzo 2.4.21-rc6 #2 SMP Die Jun 17 07:21:33 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)
Versions of packages iceme depends on:
ii icewm 1.2.12-1 A wonderful Win95-OS/2-Motif-like
ii icewm-common 1.2.12-1 A wonderful Win95-OS/2-Motif-like
ii python-gtk 0.6.11-11 GTK support module for Python
ii python2.3 2.3-4 An interactive high-level object-o
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 207595-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2004 07:39:12 +0000
>From tb@becket.net Tue Aug 10 00:39:12 2004
Return-path: <tb@becket.net>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BuRE0-0006bz-00; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:39:12 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BuRDz-0005RX-NN; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:39:11 -0700
To: 208370-done@bugs.debian.org, 208115-done@bugs.debian.org,
207595-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: bugs done
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Windows: It could be worse, but it'll take time.
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Date: 10 Aug 2004 00:39:11 -0700
Message-ID: <87llgnl9wg.fsf@becket.becket.net>
Lines: 4
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 207595-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
These bugs were fixed in NMUs 1.0.0-11.1, and 1.0.0-11, and accepted
when QA took the package at 1.0.0-12.
Reply to: