Bug#157477: marked as done (libextutils-f77-perl: binary-arch Vs Architecture: all)
Your message dated 10 Aug 2004 00:29:55 -0700
with message-id <878ycnmowc.fsf@becket.becket.net>
and subject line bugs done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2002 21:37:26 +0000
>From algernon@iluvatar.ath.cx Tue Aug 20 16:37:26 2002
Return-path: <algernon@iluvatar.ath.cx>
Received: from mail.interware.hu [195.70.32.130]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17hGgn-00054O-00; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 16:37:25 -0500
Received: from victoria-176.budapest.interware.hu ([195.70.50.176] helo=iluvatar.ath.cx)
by mail.interware.hu with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 17hGgl-0001cC-00
for <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 23:37:25 +0200
Received: by iluvatar.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1004)
id 2DBD3ABBE6; Tue, 20 Aug 2002 23:38:37 +0200 (CEST)
From: Gergely Nagy <algernon@bonehunter.rulez.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: libextutils-f77-perl: binary-arch Vs Architecture: all
X-Marvin: Life, loathe it or ignore it, you can't like it.
Message-Id: <20020820213837.2DBD3ABBE6@iluvatar.ath.cx>
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 23:38:37 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Package: libextutils-f77-perl
Severity: serious
Your package is fully Architecture: all, yet, it builds the .deb in
the binary-arch target. Since policy states that
`binary-arch' builds the binary packages which are specific to
a particular architecture, and `binary-indep' builds those
which are not.
I consider this a policy violation, therefore a serious bug.
(Hint: one shouldn't follow the dh_make template blindly. A little
thought is always a good thing.)
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 157477-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2004 07:33:03 +0000
>From tb@becket.net Tue Aug 10 00:33:03 2004
Return-path: <tb@becket.net>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BuR82-0005kL-00; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:33:02 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BuR82-0005Q8-A8; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:33:02 -0700
To: 157477-done@bugs.debian.org, 157582-done@bugs.debian.org,
134583-done@bugs.debian.org, 102206-done@bugs.debian.org,
157520-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: bugs done
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Windows: There's got to be a better way.
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Date: 10 Aug 2004 00:29:55 -0700
Message-ID: <878ycnmowc.fsf@becket.becket.net>
Lines: 4
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 157477-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5
These bugs were fixed in NMUs 1.14-2.1, and accepted when the package
was taken by QA in version 1.14-2.2.
Reply to: