Bug#150071: marked as done (Problems with Debconf templates)
Your message dated 10 Aug 2004 00:28:17 -0700
with message-id <87d61zmoz2.fsf@becket.becket.net>
and subject line bugs done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jun 2002 12:25:58 +0000
>From md9ms@mdstud.chalmers.se Sat Jun 15 07:25:58 2002
Return-path: <md9ms@mdstud.chalmers.se>
Received: from piggy.mdstud.chalmers.se [129.16.234.10]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17JCcv-0007rR-00; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 07:25:57 -0500
Received: from grosse.mdstud.chalmers.se (grosse.mdstud.chalmers.se [129.16.234.21])
by piggy.mdstud.chalmers.se (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA11941
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 14:25:54 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: (from md9ms@localhost)
by grosse.mdstud.chalmers.se (8.8.5/8.8.5) id OAA18028
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 15 Jun 2002 14:25:54 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 14:25:54 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Martin_Sj=F6gren?= <md9ms@mdstud.chalmers.se>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Problems with Debconf templates
Message-ID: <20020615142553.A17962@grosse.mdstud.chalmers.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by piggy.mdstud.chalmers.se id OAA11941
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: atftp
Version: 0.6.1.1
atftpd.templates.{es,pt_br,sv} are broken, in that the original
untranslated Description strings aren't included in them.
Shouldn't it be pt_BR btw?
Here's the output of debconf-mergetemplate:
atftp-0.6.1.1/debian$ debconf-mergetemplate atftpd.templates.* \
atftpd.templates > /dev/null
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/configure description is missing; dropping
description-es
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/tftpd-timeout description is missing;
dropping description-es
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/retry-timeout description is missing;
dropping description-es
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/maxthread description is missing; dropping
description-es
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/verbosity description is missing; dropping
description-es
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/logtofile description is missing; dropping
description-es
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/logfile description is missing; dropping
description-es
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/basedir description is missing; dropping
description-es
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/logtofile description is missing; dropping
description-pt_br
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/use_inetd description is missing; dropping
description-pt_br
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/maxthread description is missing; dropping
description-pt_br
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/configure description is missing; dropping
description-pt_br
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/tftpd-timeout description is missing;
dropping description-pt_br
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/basedir description is missing; dropping
description-pt_br
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/verbosity description is missing; dropping
description-pt_br
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/logfile description is missing; dropping
description-pt_br
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/retry-timeout description is missing;
dropping description-pt_br
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/configure description is missing; dropping
description-sv
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/tftpd-timeout description is missing;
dropping description-sv
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/retry-timeout description is missing;
dropping description-sv
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/maxthread description is missing; dropping
description-sv
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/verbosity description is missing; dropping
description-sv
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/logtofile description is missing; dropping
description-sv
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/logfile description is missing; dropping
description-sv
debconf-mergetemplate: atftpd/basedir description is missing; dropping
description-sv
--=20
Martin Sj=F6gren
md9ms@mdstud.chalmers.se ICQ : 41245059
Phone: +46 (0)31 405242 Cell: +46 (0)739 169191
GPG key: http://www.mdstud.chalmers.se/~md9ms/gpg.html
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 150071-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2004 07:28:18 +0000
>From tb@becket.net Tue Aug 10 00:28:18 2004
Return-path: <tb@becket.net>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BuR3S-0005Ay-00; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:28:18 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BuR3R-0005Oq-R0; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:28:17 -0700
To: 142949-done@bugs.debian.org, 150071-done@bugs.debian.org,
198223-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: bugs done
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Windows: Warn your friends about it.
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Date: 10 Aug 2004 00:28:17 -0700
Message-ID: <87d61zmoz2.fsf@becket.becket.net>
Lines: 4
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 150071-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
These bugs were fixed by NMUs 0.6.1.1 and 0.6.2.1, and accepted when
QA took the package at version 0.6.3.
Reply to: