[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#247443: marked as done (diskless-image-secure: Syntax error in postinst script.)

Your message dated Sun, 13 Jun 2004 18:02:16 -0400
with message-id <E1BZd3Q-0001Vh-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#247443: fixed in diskless
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 May 2004 07:34:41 +0000
>From ivan@selidor.net Wed May 05 00:34:41 2004
Return-path: <ivan@selidor.net>
Received: from 74.red-80-25-29.pooles.rima-tde.net (orm-embar.terramar.selidor.net) [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BLGvQ-0003lX-00; Wed, 05 May 2004 00:34:41 -0700
Received: from ivan by orm-embar.terramar.selidor.net with local (Exim 4.31)
	id 1BLGwd-0006Nr-TW; Wed, 05 May 2004 09:35:55 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ivan Vilata i Balaguer <ivan@selidor.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: diskless-image-secure: Syntax error in postinst script.
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 09:35:55 +0200
Message-Id: <E1BLGwd-0006Nr-TW@orm-embar.terramar.selidor.net>
Sender: Ivan Vilata i Balaguer <ivan@orm-embar.terramar.selidor.net>
X-BadReturnPath: ivan@orm-embar.terramar.selidor.net rewritten as ivan@selidor.net
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 1

Package: diskless-image-secure
Severity: important

      Hello.  I have found two simple syntax errors in the postinst
  script that are triggered when devfs support is enabled.  The script
  contains the lines:

	# convert from good looking boolean template to what expected in the scripts
	if [ $devfs = 'true' ] ; then
		devfs = 'yes'
		devfs = 'no'

  Of course, no space should be left around the equal sign in the

	# convert from good looking boolean template to what expected in the scripts
	if [ $devfs = 'true' ] ; then

  With this fix the image instalation works OK.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.24orm
Locale: LANG=ca_ES, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES

Received: (at 247443-close) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jun 2004 22:08:05 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Sun Jun 13 15:08:05 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [] (mail)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BZd93-0002pm-00; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 15:08:05 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BZd3Q-0001Vh-00; Sun, 13 Jun 2004 18:02:16 -0400
From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
To: 247443-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.49 $
Subject: Bug#247443: fixed in diskless
Message-Id: <E1BZd3Q-0001Vh-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 18:02:16 -0400
Delivered-To: 247443-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: diskless

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
diskless, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

  to pool/main/d/diskless/diskless-image-secure_0.
  to pool/main/d/diskless/diskless-image-simple_0.
  to pool/main/d/diskless/diskless_0.
  to pool/main/d/diskless/diskless_0.
  to pool/main/d/diskless/diskless_0.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 247443@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org> (supplier of updated diskless package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)

Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 23:37:34 +0200
Source: diskless
Binary: diskless-image-secure diskless-image-simple diskless
Architecture: source all
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
 diskless   - Generate NFS file structure for diskless boot.
 diskless-image-secure - Files required for secure NFS-Root image.
 diskless-image-simple - Files required for simple NFS-Root image.
Closes: 246741 247443 247530 251394 252344
 diskless ( unstable; urgency=low
   * QA Upload
   * Fix syntax errors in postinst scripts
     (Closes: #246741, #247443, #247530)
   * Dutch debconf template translation by Luk Claes
     (Closes: #251394)
   * German debconf template translation by Erik Schanze
     (Closes: #252344)
 6b5f621f4a4ec68d290039da49eb116e 608 misc extra diskless_0.
 2339a8e171c2e984d7940ac8d1996d28 65004 misc extra diskless_0.
 2c5871a0732e61a3dc81db704813d1f0 37214 misc extra diskless_0.
 7362974726197ade0b10f4938352991b 16758 misc extra diskless-image-simple_0.
 fa69c3a42802f3771e836635aba0f639 20338 misc extra diskless-image-secure_0.

Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)


Reply to: