Bug#209075: marked as done (cryptoloop-source: Should add a note about 2.4.22)
Your message dated Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:27:05 +0200
with message-id <20040422162705.GA3497@djpig.de>
and subject line Packages were removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 2003 15:09:17 +0000
>From bernat@lucas.teaser.fr Sun Sep 07 10:09:15 2003
Return-path: <bernat@lucas.teaser.fr>
Received: from postfix4-2.free.fr [213.228.0.176]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19w1AA-0000eM-00; Sun, 07 Sep 2003 10:09:14 -0500
Received: from lucas (unknown [82.67.232.123])
by postfix4-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 491F4C19D; Sun, 7 Sep 2003 17:09:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from guybrush.loria (guybrush.loria [10.0.0.8])
by lucas (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 229153F6D; Sun, 7 Sep 2003 17:09:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by guybrush.loria (Postfix, from userid 500)
id 1119526D905; Sun, 7 Sep 2003 16:50:00 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Vincent Bernat <bernat@free.fr>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: cryptoloop-source: Should add a note about 2.4.22
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.27
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2003 16:50:00 +0200
Message-Id: <20030907145000.1119526D905@guybrush.loria>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: cryptoloop-source
Version: 0.0.0+0.0.1-pre1-9
Severity: normal
Tags: sid
Hello,
2.4.22 includes cryptoapi but not cryptoloop. So cryptoloop may not depend
on cryptoapi-core-source but it seems that cryptoloop is not compatible with
cryptoapi as included in 2.4.22. There are several patches lying around on
this issue but I have not tested them.
A note in NEWS or an URL to explain what to do with a 2.4.22 would be welcome.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux guybrush 2.4.21-ben2-guybrush.45 #1 mer jui 30 19:55:47 CEST 2003 ppc
Locale: LANG=fr_FR@euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro
Versions of packages cryptoloop-source depends on:
ii bash 2.05b-8.1 The GNU Bourne Again SHell
ii build-essential 9.6 informational list of build-essent
ii cryptoapi-core-source 0.1.0-4 CryptoAPI core kernel module
ii grep-dctrl 1.102 Grep Debian package information
ii kernel-patch-scripts 0.99.27 Scripts to help dealing with packa
ii patch 2.5.9-1 Apply a diff file to an original
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 209075-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Apr 2004 16:27:12 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Thu Apr 22 09:27:12 2004
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net [217.160.169.191]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BGh2e-0002Mf-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 09:27:12 -0700
Received: from p50839807.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.131.152.7] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1BGh2d-0003sH-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:27:11 +0200
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BGh2X-0002cY-00; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:27:05 +0200
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:27:05 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
To: 212145-done@bugs.debian.org, 200562-done@bugs.debian.org,
208873-done@bugs.debian.org, 208882-done@bugs.debian.org,
209075-done@bugs.debian.org, 210268-done@bugs.debian.org,
215435-done@bugs.debian.org, 169044-done@bugs.debian.org,
203538-done@bugs.debian.org, 200561-done@bugs.debian.org,
210267-done@bugs.debian.org, 211930-done@bugs.debian.org,
169038-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Packages were removed
Message-ID: <20040422162705.GA3497@djpig.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: 209075-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 8
The cryptoapi-core-source and cryptoloop-source packages were
removed from Debian unstable yesterday so I close their remaining bugs.
[Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:37:55 -0400] [ftpmaster: James Troup]
Removed the following packages from unstable:
cryptoapi-core-source | 0.1.0-5 | source, all
cryptoloop-source | 0.0.0+0.0.1-pre1-10 | source, all
Closed bugs: 242245
------------------- Reason -------------------
ROM; unmaintained, don't apply to modern kernel.
----------------------------------------------
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Reply to: