[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#219546: marked as done (catalog: FTBFS: Obsolete Build-Depends)



Your message dated Tue, 18 Nov 2003 11:32:10 -0500
with message-id <E1AM8lu-0002hM-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#219546: fixed in catalog 1.03-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Nov 2003 09:00:50 +0000
>From daniel@frobnitz.ddts.net Fri Nov 07 03:00:33 2003
Return-path: <daniel@frobnitz.ddts.net>
Received: from barry.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.25] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AI2Tp-0002hF-00; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 03:00:33 -0600
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3] helo=frobnitz.ddts.net)
	by barry.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
	id 1AI2Tp-0006Ge-00
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 04:00:33 -0500
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.ddts.net with local (Exim 4.24)
	id 1AI2TY-0005CR-Uf
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 07 Nov 2003 01:00:16 -0800
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: catalog: FTBFS: Obsolete Build-Depends
From: Daniel Schepler <schepler@math.berkeley.edu>
Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2003 01:00:16 -0800
Message-ID: <87ptg4a6zj.fsf@frobnitz.ddts.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Daniel Schepler <daniel@frobnitz.ddts.net>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_60,HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_03 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: catalog
Severity: serious
Version: 1.03-7.3

The catalog source package has a Build-Depends on
"libmime-base64-perl(>=2.11)".  Since that's been absorbed into the
perl package, it's no longer possible to satisfy this version
dependency using unstable.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux frobnitz 2.6.0-test9 #1 Thu Oct 30 13:37:15 PST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


-- 
Daniel Schepler              "Please don't disillusion me.  I
schepler@math.berkeley.edu    haven't had breakfast yet."
                                 -- Orson Scott Card

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 219546-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Nov 2003 16:38:13 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Tue Nov 18 10:38:13 2003
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AM8rk-0007Xv-00; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:38:12 -0600
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AM8lu-0002hM-00; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 11:32:10 -0500
From: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
To: 219546-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.43 $
Subject: Bug#219546: fixed in catalog 1.03-8
Message-Id: <E1AM8lu-0002hM-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 11:32:10 -0500
Delivered-To: 219546-close@bugs.debian.org

Source: catalog
Source-Version: 1.03-8

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
catalog, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

catalog_1.03-8.diff.gz
  to pool/main/c/catalog/catalog_1.03-8.diff.gz
catalog_1.03-8.dsc
  to pool/main/c/catalog/catalog_1.03-8.dsc
catalog_1.03-8_all.deb
  to pool/main/c/catalog/catalog_1.03-8_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 219546@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de> (supplier of updated catalog package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 17:15:11 +0100
Source: catalog
Binary: catalog
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.03-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Description: 
 catalog    - Tool to create,maintain and display Yahoo! like directories
Closes: 197538 219546 219673
Changes: 
 catalog (1.03-8) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA Upload (change version number to a non-NMU one)
   * Add alternative dependency to perl 5.8.0 for some now
     included modules (Closes: #219546: FTBFS: Obsolete Build-Depends)
   * Increase debhelper build dependency to >= 4.1.13 because of
     po-debconf support of dh_installdebconf
   * Add Portuguese debconf translation by
     Andre Luis Lopes <andrelop@debian.org> (Closes: #197538)
   * Remove dh_undocumented call from debian/rules
   * Add lintian override for partially-translated-question, there is no sense
     in translating PostgreSQL and MySQL
   * Sponsor QA patch from Frank (closes: #219673).
     -- Peter Palfrader <weasel@debian.org>
Files: 
 016c4857c163e618ce67125ea7c20eee 957 web extra catalog_1.03-8.dsc
 8933f68a7075e1137324b54a7efe7ffb 22654 web extra catalog_1.03-8.diff.gz
 a7130a00c63fc0d898e33594a3d7b40a 657366 web extra catalog_1.03-8_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/ukdOz/ccs6+kS90RAk+OAJ9lEGaykYQ+qfE2tlnto1XXz0OFfwCfSxXp
fdvcUCFT+2o+Lnnbz4n3yqo=
=AlZb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: