[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#164449: gadfly should provide python-kjbuckets

reassign 161565 python-kjbuckets

Matej Vela writes:
> Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de> writes:
> > gadfly now contains the modules from python-kjbuckets, so it should
> > provide python-kjbuckets.
> python-kjbuckets is indeed included in the sources, but the binary
> package contains only a private, pure-Python kjbuckets implementation
> used if python-kjbuckets is missing (note that gadfly Recommends it).
> Having been written in C, python-kjbuckets is considerably faster, and
> three times smaller than gadfly.
> If you insist, I think it would be better to remove the pure-Python
> code and make python-kjbuckets a dependency of gadfly.

no. because the separate python-kjbuckets source is outdated, it would
be best, if you build python-kjbuckets from the gadfly source (in the
existing python*-kjbuckts packages). Be prepared to get the version
number for the python*-kjbuckts packages right.

I am doing a NMU for python-kjbuckets now, to fix the installation
problem, but I would like to see python-kjbuckets integrated into


Reply to: