Bug#164449: gadfly should provide python-kjbuckets
Matthias Klose <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> gadfly now contains the modules from python-kjbuckets, so it should
> provide python-kjbuckets.
python-kjbuckets is indeed included in the sources, but the binary
package contains only a private, pure-Python kjbuckets implementation
used if python-kjbuckets is missing (note that gadfly Recommends it).
Having been written in C, python-kjbuckets is considerably faster, and
three times smaller than gadfly.
If you insist, I think it would be better to remove the pure-Python
code and make python-kjbuckets a dependency of gadfly.