Re: 2 issues about zope-* packages
- To: "Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis" <email@example.com>
- Cc: Andrea Fanfani <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Andreas Tille <email@example.com>, Bastian Blank <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Behan Webster <email@example.com>, Christian Leutloff <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Debian QA Group <email@example.com>, Federico Di Gregorio <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Gregor Hoffleit <email@example.com>, "James W. Penny" <firstname.lastname@example.org>, AJohn Goerzen <email@example.com>
- Subject: Re: 2 issues about zope-* packages
- From: "Tille, Andreas" <TilleA@rki.de>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 07:40:20 +0100 (CET)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.firstname.lastname@example.org>
- In-reply-to: <20020326002711.GA23775@cantina.students.cs.unibo.it>
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> I'd appreciate any opinion, hint and so on.
I really like your idea of a centralized organisation of a debconf
template for all zope modules and I would support this.
Unfortunately the reality is that I guess half of the debconf-ized
Zope packages where only for one reason in the current state: Because
I had to NMU it and switched to debconf without asking the (mostly
not responsively) maintainer. This is kind of impoliteness on my site
but I thought it would do a favour to Debian.
The problem is that you can't force lazy maintainers and that ignorance
of your sane proposal does not end in a RC bug. So I see problems in
realizing your proposal.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org