Re: 2 issues about zope-* packages
- To: "Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Cc: Andrea Fanfani <email@example.com>, Andreas Tille <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Bastian Blank <email@example.com>, Behan Webster <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Christian Leutloff <email@example.com>, Debian QA Group <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Federico Di Gregorio <email@example.com>, Gregor Hoffleit <firstname.lastname@example.org>, "James W. Penny" <email@example.com>, AJohn Goerzen <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: 2 issues about zope-* packages
- From: "Tille, Andreas" <TilleA@rki.de>
- Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 07:40:20 +0100 (CET)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <20020326002711.GA23775@cantina.students.cs.unibo.it>
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis wrote:
> I'd appreciate any opinion, hint and so on.
I really like your idea of a centralized organisation of a debconf
template for all zope modules and I would support this.
Unfortunately the reality is that I guess half of the debconf-ized
Zope packages where only for one reason in the current state: Because
I had to NMU it and switched to debconf without asking the (mostly
not responsively) maintainer. This is kind of impoliteness on my site
but I thought it would do a favour to Debian.
The problem is that you can't force lazy maintainers and that ignorance
of your sane proposal does not end in a RC bug. So I see problems in
realizing your proposal.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com