Re: retitling ITP's [round 2]
Hi Luca!
You wrote:
> > I intend to retitle those to RFPs:
>
> Is it the procedure?
> I mean: if no one packaged them in more than a year, it could mean there is
> no one interested in that package any more.
> More over, some of that software may no longer be developed or even exists.
> IMHO we may close those kind of reports, along with those older RFP.
Hmm, perhaps you are right. However, my motivation to seek out the
non-active ITPs in the first place, is to give other developers a chance
to work on those packages.
You are probably right though, that RFPs should be closed after being
inactive for a while. There are only 54 RFPs in the WNPP atm though, so
I don't this is really a problem yet.
--
Kind regards,
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | GPG key: 0644fab7 |
|----------------------------| Fingerprint: c1f5 f24c d514 3fec 8bf6 |
| bas@o2w.nl, bas@debian.org | a2b1 2bae e41f 0644 fab7 |
+--------------------------------------------------------------------+
Reply to: