Hello Christian,
c.buhtz@posteo.jp writes:
> Hello Nicholas,
> Thank you for your interesting feedback.
>
> Am 16.06.2025 23:48 schrieb Nicholas D Steeves:
>> if backintime's upstream will officially
>> support Debian's btrfs layout ("@rootfs" rather than "@").
>
> I don't know enough about "btrfs" to understand that. Feel free to
> explain this in an upstream Issue [1] or at our mailing list [2]. We are
> always open for discussion. Keep in mind that backintime does use rsync
> in the back.
>
>> also encourage upstream to support Fedora's flat layout ("root" and
>> "home" if I remember correctly, maybe "rootfs"). It's still just a
>> two-subvolume flat layout.
>
> I also don't understand that. Is this also related to the btrfs topic?
I'm sorry, I must have been half-asleep, distracted, or confused,
because I mixed up backintime (rsync only?) with timeshift (btrfs or
rsync).
It looks like the maintainer took care of
https://bugs.debian.org/1106754 ... For the record, a bug that is
serious enough to merit an unblock during the hard-freeze is serious
enough to merit a stable-update post-release.
Kind regards,
Nicholas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature