c.buhtz@posteo.jp writes:
> Hello Soren,
> Thank you for the reply.
>
> Am 16.06.2025 19:25 schrieb Soren Stoutner:
>> If you are willing to do the packaging yourself
>
> Willing is not the problem but I lack of expertise and capabilities. I
> tried that several times for packages much easier than backintime. It is
> really not an option I am doing the packaging myself.
> Packing backintime need an experienced packager.
I'm willing to do an NMU if backintime's upstream will officially
support Debian's btrfs layout ("@rootfs" rather than "@"). Without that
I don't see the point of doing an NMU to make something allegedly buggy
(and nonfunctional) allegedly not buggy (and nonfunctional). I would
also encourage upstream to support Fedora's flat layout ("root" and
"home" if I remember correctly, maybe "rootfs"). It's still just a
two-subvolume flat layout.
Given that they all use the same flat layout (unlike SUSE), refusing to
support them is political rather than technical.
Best,
Nicholas
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature