Re: Status of sqlalchemy
On 4/14/24 23:23, Martin wrote:
Hi,
are there any news regarding the status of sqlalchemy?
I'm curious, because the next version of gajim will depend on
sqlalchemy >= 2, which is only in experimental right now.
Cheers
Hi,
As much as I know, Piotr has been nicely putting this on old until the
OpenStack packages could be fixed. Thanks for the patience. OpenStack
2024.1 (aka: Caracal) was released 2 weeks ago, and I uploaded all of it
in Unstable. It's nice much better.
Let me give you a quick comment on the situation.
I'm still waiting on Manila support which is the most annoying one. I've
been told that upstream Manila will backport all the SQLA 2.x fixes when
they land in Master.
As per this:
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1&package=sqlalchemy
SQLA 2.x will also break Trove and Zaqar, but we can probably live with
them broken until the next release of OpenStack. I care more about Trove
(OpenStack DB as a service) than Zaqar (Messaging as a Service). I hope
Trove upstream contributors will fix the situation, but at this point I
don't know the status. I don't really use gertty, and I'm unsure why
it's doing unit tests against SQLA. These could probably be ignored.
The rest of:
- pymodbus
- sqlalchemy-utc
- wtforms-alchemy
I don't even know what they do.
All that to say: I'm ok at this point if SQLA 2.x is uploaded to Sid and
we move on...
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Reply to: