[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Maintenance of python-cryptography



Hi!




On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 4:19 AM Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org> wrote:
On 3/13/24 18:34, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064979
>
> Would some of you who are pushing so hard to change the policy for Uploaders/
> Maintainer in the team please step up and take over this package.  It really
> needs updated to the new upstream release (blocking both aioquic and
> dnspythong for me, I don't know about others).
>
> I haven't done a comprehensive check, but I think morph asked for all the leaf
> packages he was maintaining in the team to be removed from the archive and is
> removing himself from uploaders/maintainer on others.
>
> You all made this mess.  Please clean it up.

Absolutely not. Sandro did. There's btw absolutely no reason to declare
a package as "orphan" if it is supposed to be team maintained. It's also
a very bad behavior to do this silently, without telling the team about
it, or taking part of the thread. I very much regret things are
happening this way, but I don't think the rest of the team should be
held responsible.

If you have the list of the packages matching what you are saying,
please do share.

I think you are looking for this https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2024/03/msg00045.html  

On 3/14/24 08:52, Andreas Tille wrote:
 > I would have prefered to
 > read constructive arguments instead of silent leaving the team (in the
 > sense of not informing the team mailing list about the leave).

Me too. But I'm not surprised.


Cheers,

Thomas Goirand (zigo)


Reply to: