Re: Fixing pytest-twisted ^W Updating twisted
Hi again,
Am 24.01.22 um 06:35 schrieb Carsten Schoenert:
...
So I think I can answer my original question by myself. These two
packages are not relevant and not needed any more. But thanks for your
feedback!
I moved along and worked further on tuning the packaging for twisted.
I'm able to build new binary packages for the latest release of 21.7.0
and also can run the autopkgtest at the end successful. Again I've
pushed all to
https://salsa.debian.org/tijuca/twisted
Also the Lintian issues are down to an amount of minimum compared to the
output for 20.3.0.
https://lintian.debian.org/sources/twisted
$ lintian -IE --pedantic
W: python3-twisted: no-manual-page usr/bin/cftp3
W: python3-twisted: no-manual-page usr/bin/ckeygen3
W: python3-twisted: no-manual-page usr/bin/conch3
W: python3-twisted: no-manual-page ... use --no-tag-display-limit to see all (or pipe to a file/program)
W: twisted-doc: privacy-breach-generic usr/share/doc/twisted-doc/html/_downloads/c0d415299e6995227a6e3c8a2ed17fe5/slots-attributes-output.html [<img src="http://example.com/user.png"; />] (http://example.com/user.png)
W: python3-twisted: uses-implicit-await-trigger interest (line 1)
W: twisted-doc: zero-byte-file-in-doc-directory usr/share/doc/twisted-doc/html/api/extra.css
X: python3-twisted: application-in-library-section python usr/bin/twistd3 usr/bin/twist3 usr/bin/cftp3 usr/bin/pyhtmlizer3 usr/bin/trial3 usr/bin/conch3 usr/bin/mailmail3 usr/bin/ckeygen3 usr/bin/tkconch3
X: python3-twisted: library-package-name-for-application usr/bin/twistd3 usr/bin/twist3 usr/bin/cftp3 usr/bin/pyhtmlizer3 usr/bin/trial3 usr/bin/conch3 usr/bin/mailmail3 usr/bin/ckeygen3 usr/bin/tkconch3
X: twisted source: debian-watch-does-not-check-gpg-signature
X: twisted-doc: duplicate-files usr/share/doc/twisted-doc/development/index.rst usr/share/doc/twisted-doc/html/_sources/core/development/index.rst.txt
X: twisted-doc: duplicate-files usr/share/doc/twisted-doc/development/listings/new_module_template.py usr/share/doc/twisted-doc/html/_downloads/4ba91eba2b7dc02d171b2b303f7cae54/new_module_template.py
X: twisted-doc: duplicate-files usr/share/doc/twisted-doc/development/naming.rst usr/share/doc/twisted-doc/html/_sources/core/development/naming.rst.txt
X: twisted-doc: duplicate-files ... use --no-tag-display-limit to see all (or pipe to a file/program)
P: twisted-doc: example-unusual-interpreter python [usr/share/doc/twisted-doc/examples/courier.py]
P: twisted-doc: example-unusual-interpreter python [usr/share/doc/twisted-doc/examples/dbcred.py]
P: twisted-doc: example-unusual-interpreter python [usr/share/doc/twisted-doc/examples/echoclient.py]
P: twisted-doc: example-unusual-interpreter ... use --no-tag-display-limit to see all (or pipe to a file/program)
P: python3-twisted: executable-in-usr-lib usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/twisted/mail/test/pop3testserver.py
P: python3-twisted: executable-in-usr-lib usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/twisted/trial/test/scripttest.py
P: twisted-doc: repeated-path-segment finger usr/share/doc/twisted-doc/howto/tutorial/listings/finger/finger/
P: twisted source: very-long-line-length-in-source-file NEWS.rst line 196 is 1030 characters long (>512)
P: twisted source: very-long-line-length-in-source-file docs/core/howto/amp.rst line 183 is 535 characters long (>512)
P: twisted source: very-long-line-length-in-source-file docs/core/howto/defer.rst line 501 is 702 characters long (>512)
P: twisted source: very-long-line-length-in-source-file ... use --no-tag-display-limit to see all (or pipe to a file/program)
The original issue because I was looking into twisted isn't fixed yet,
the used upstream version hasn't fixed the deprecation warning for
currentThread().
But a new main upstream version 22.1.0 is in preparation, that will come
with a merged in PR to fix this.
https://github.com/twisted/twisted/pull/1671
Besides this I think I'm mostly ready to give the current state a try
and upload the modifications to unstable.
Still I'm happy to hear other minds about updating twisted before going
further.
--
Regards
Carsten
Reply to: