Re: pdm-pep517: Shall we package it now?
On 2022-06-28 09 h 24, Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have encountered more and more packages that uses pdm-pep517 as build
> backend. Looking at [1], existing packages in Debian added patches to
> manually switch to other backends, such as Poetry.
>
> I am wondering if it's time to package pdm-pep517 itself [2], or is there
> any blocking for it. I am aware that some sort of bootstrapping might be
> needed since pdm-pep517 seems to build-depends on itself. Besides that, what
> about packaging of pdm? Please correct me if needed: my mind and my
> packaging work is still stuck in the old times of setup.py, and I just
> started to look into the new ecosystem of pep517. Thanks!
>
> Regards,
> Boyuan Yang
>
>
> [1] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=pdm.pep517
> [2] https://github.com/pdm-project/pdm-pep517
Once packaged, please ping me so I can update the
"missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend" Lintian tag accordingly and
let people know they can migrate to it.
--
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org
⠈⠳⣄
Reply to: