Re: <DKIM> Re: dropping python2 [was Re: scientific python stack transitions]
On 7/16/19 5:42 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> no, that's your interpretation, not mine. If an important enough application
> still needs it, we should ship it.
Could you please clarify what you call "an important enough
application"? Important for who/what? Who's to decide, and on what criteria?
Also, if that application is important enough, why nobody worked on
porting it to Python 3?
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Reply to: