Re: Questions about salsa and Git
Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> writes:
> Is this now official policy for new/updated/converted Python modules
> maintained by DPMT?
>
> Is it official policy for new/updated/converted Python applications
> maintained by PAPT?
I am not exactly an authoritive figure, but I believe the answer to both
of these is yes.
It is possible that there are a number of packages that still need to be
converted. I had a script on aloth to do this, it might need updating
for salsa. Especially as it relied on direct access to the git directory
to change the default branch.
> At the moment each of those pages says that the Python teams have chosen
> the relevant packaging system and that the other packaging system is
> forbidden, which is confusing at best.
Both pages do need updating.
--
Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Reply to: