1) On d/copyright, the license specified for the project is wrong.
According to the LICENSE file, the project is released under a slightly
modified version of the Apache license. This is something really
important to get right, otherwise the ftp-masters will certainly reject
the package. You listed the license as being "GPL-2", but the text is
clearly not GPL-2.
Ohh!!! Sorry I saw the old d/copyright file to do this.
2) Still on d/copyright: as said above, the GPL-2 license is wrong.
However, I think it's also important to mention that the license text is
formatted in a strange/wrong manner. You have text like this:
[...]
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
are met:
1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above
[...]
The correct format for d/copyright is to indent the text using 1 space,
and to use . (dot) for blank lines. Like this:
[...]
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
are met:
.
1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above
[...]
Ready!
3) The package uses a *really* old version of debhelper (version 5!).
We're at version 11 already, so you should update both d/compat and
d/control (i.e., depend on debhelp >= 11) to reflect that.
Ready!
4) You haven't addressed my comment about building a Python 3 package.
IMO you should really do that; lintian will warn you if you don't.
Yes, I forgot do that! Sorry!
5) You haven't answered my question about why the package has "Suggests:
doc-base". It seems to be a relic from this very old debhelper; I think
you can safely remove it.
Yes, I remove it. Since I do not have much knowledge about doc-base and why it is there, I left it. But now is removed.
Thanks for your help!
Regards!