Re: Salvaging python-cassandra for Stretch
On 04/06/2017 09:36 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 04/06/2017 08:39 PM, Ondrej Novy wrote:
>> And auto -dbgsym doesn't support python-dbg. So it's wrong for Python C
>> modules.
>
> I guess I need to read more about this then.
>
> On 04/06/2017 06:31 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
>> In my opinion a better solution (for Stretch) would be just adding an
>> Architecture: field to the -dbg packages (and for Buster, porting the
>> code to support big endian architectures).
>
> This looks like the most reasonable solution to me. Thoughts anyone?
Does anyone oppose to an upload with this change?
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Reply to: