Re: Salvaging python-cassandra for Stretch
On 04/06/2017 08:39 PM, Ondrej Novy wrote:
> And auto -dbgsym doesn't support python-dbg. So it's wrong for Python C
> modules.
I guess I need to read more about this then.
On 04/06/2017 06:31 PM, Dmitry Shachnev wrote:
> In my opinion a better solution (for Stretch) would be just adding an
> Architecture: field to the -dbg packages (and for Buster, porting the
> code to support big endian architectures).
This looks like the most reasonable solution to me. Thoughts anyone?
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Reply to: