Re: providing sphinx3-* binaries

[Ghislain Vaillant <ghisvail@gmail.com>]

On 03/10/17 22:46, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 09/29/2017 01:08 PM, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> > Hello guyes.
> >
> > > override_dh_sphinxdoc:
> > > ifeq (,$(findstring nodocs, $(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
> >                                  ^^^^
> > nodocs or nodoc
> >
> > I alsa do something like this when there is extensions.
> >
> > override_dh_sphinxdoc:
> > ifeq (,$(findstring nodoc, $(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)))
> > 	PYBUILD_SYSTEM=custom \
> > 	PYBUILD_BUILD_ARGS="cd docs && PYTHONPATH={build_dir} http_proxy='127.0.0.1:9' {interpreter} -m sphinx -N -bhtml source build/html" dh_auto_build  # HTML generator
> > 	dh_installdocs "docs/build/html" -p python-gpyfft-doc
> > 	dh_sphinxdoc -O--buildsystem=pybuild
> > endif
>
> In fact, I was thinking that probably, it'd be nicer to even do:
>
> ifeq (,$(findstring nodoc, $(DEB_BUILD_PROFILES)))
>
> and have Build-Profiles: <!nodoc> for the python-foo-doc package. This
> could even become a standard in the DPMT if everyone agrees.
>
> Thoughts anyone?

s/DEB_BUILD_PROFILES/DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS

Quoting the relevant part of the documentation for the nodoc build 
profile [1]:

"Builds that set this profile must also add nodoc to DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS"

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/BuildProfileSpec

Cheers,
Ghis