Re: static analysis and other tools for checking Python code
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 9:23 PM, Nicolas Chauvat wrote:
> Maybe add pylint?
As I understand it:
pylint runs code from the source tree so it isn't suitable for running
by default as that could be a security issue for people reviewing
potentially untrusted code.
pylint isn't able to be run automatically, it needs a human to come up
with the right command-line.
c-a-t-t could certainly print a suggestion to run pylint like it does
for fuzzers like afl/zzuf.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: