Hi all, On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 08:19:46AM +0100, Sandro Tosi wrote: > does anyone else agrees with this view? should we clarify that, when > available, python2 modules must be provided (along with their py3k)? I disagree with the “must” wording. For example, I have a module (which supports both Python 2 and 3), but the only user of this module is an app (which is Python 3 only). What’s the point of shipping the Python 2 version of that module then? In my opinion, we should neither encourage nor discourage shipping the Python 2 version, and let the maintainer make the decision. -- Dmitry Shachnev
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature