Re: CPython hash randomization makes some Python packages unreproducible
On Apr 09, 2016, at 08:11 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
>FWIW I think that's a bad idea. A number of packages run their test
>suite at build time, and running the tests with hash randomization
>enabled seems to me like something we shouldn't give up.
Completely agreed. Although we're in the long tail now, during the bulk of
the Python 3 transition, we found real bugs when hash randomization was
enabled.
>Couldn't packages where the binary packages contents depend on the hash seed
>just set one themselves?
+1
-Barry
Reply to: