Re: Packaging Python that requires 3.5

To: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Packaging Python that requires 3.5
From: Brian May <bam@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 10:04:51 +1100
Message-id: <[🔎] 87zixxiv3g.fsf@prune.linuxpenguins.xyz>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20151128180936.GA3495@mitya57.me>
References: <[🔎] 87two6k65n.fsf@prune.linuxpenguins.xyz> <[🔎] 20151128180936.GA3495@mitya57.me>

Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org> writes:

> I recommend simply waiting until 3.5 is the default (do we have any ETA
> for that?).

Good question. If it was anytime soon, I would wait.

However I don't know much about this Python 3.5 transition, or what the
current waiting point is.

Is there anything that can be done to help?
-- 
Brian May <bam@debian.org>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Which bug report is tracking the “python3 is Python 3.5” transition? (was: Packaging Python that requires 3.5)
  - From: Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>

References:
- Packaging Python that requires 3.5
  - From: Brian May <brian@linuxpenguins.xyz>
- Re: Packaging Python that requires 3.5
  - From: Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Packaging Python that requires 3.5
Next by Date: Which bug report is tracking the “python3 is Python 3.5” transition? (was: Packaging Python that requires 3.5)
Previous by thread: Re: Packaging Python that requires 3.5
Next by thread: Which bug report is tracking the “python3 is Python 3.5” transition? (was: Packaging Python that requires 3.5)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread