Hi Thomas, On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 06:17:33PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> I will appreciate if you backport Sphinx because I was recently asked about >> the same [1]. > > Cool. > >> You will maybe also want to backport sphinx-rtd-theme ≥ 0.1.8-2, >> where the dh_sphinxdoc experience was greatly improved. > > As much as I could see, I don't need sphinx-rtd-theme in backports. OK. >> You will also definitely have to do some changes like reverting the jquery >> dependency bump made in 1.3.1-7 — Sphinx works with previous jquery versions, >> but it had some issues with browser supports, that's why the dependency was >> bumped. > > There's already a version 1.11.3+dfsg-4~bpo8+1 of jquery in backports, > which is the one I also need for my other packages. So I don't think > that one is a blocker. Ack, I didn't notice that. Then there is a chance that you won't need any changes (except adding a changelog entry) :) -- Dmitry Shachnev
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature