Re: python-networkx_1.10-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental
On 10/06/2015 03:31 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>
>
> On October 5, 2015 8:42:40 PM EDT, Brian May <brian@microcomaustralia.com.au> wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Oct 2015 at 09:33 Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Except in this case you not only didn't but then got defensive when
>> called
>>> on it. If you'd just reacted with something like "Oops, made a
>> mistake,
>>> I'll
>>> revert it from svn and ask for it to be removed from experimental."
>>> (fortunately for experimental we can do that) then this wouldn't have
>> been
>>> a big deal.
>>>
>>
>> I get the impression that the complaint was "process wasn't followed"
>> as
>> opposed to "I didn't want that package in experimental". So unless I am
>> mistaken, there doesn't seem to be any need to remove the package from
>> experimental. In this particular case.
>
> I think that generally when one transgresses on someone else's package in a way the maintainer doesn't like it's the responsibility of the transgressor to offer to fix it.
I was told not to commit anymore.
Thomas
Reply to: