[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [DPMT] radical changes: automation, carrot and stick



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

On 2015-10-02 18:12, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On Oct 02 2015, Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org> wrote:
>> I think that the main problem of our team is that we have over
>> 300 members and only few people contribute to packages they
>> didn't inject to the repo (some people do not care even about
>> those).
> 
> I always assumed that it was generally preferred to have Python
> packages be maintained in the Python team, even if the maintainer
> has little interest or time in contributing to other Python
> packages.
> 
> Did I get the wrong impression?

this was also my impression and the main reason why i joined the team.

i brought in 3 packages needed as a dependency for some other package
maintained by pkg-multimedia; the 3 modules are general purpose, so it
makes little sense to maintain them in pkg-multimedia - DPMT seemed to
be the right place.

as others have mentioned, i also set DPMT as "maintainer", in order to
not keep anybody from contributing (and not because I wanted to unload
the packaging burden on the team).

fgmasdr
IOhannes

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=n8eR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: