[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#786247: pyvtk: deprecation of python-support



On August 8, 2015 10:13:04 AM Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Steve M. Robbins, 2015-08-08]
> 
> >      I went looking for the most recent sources and found out that you
> > 
> > can easily get pyvtk via pip.
> 
> `sudo pip install ...` is the same as `rm -rf /` to me.

I see.

> Please don't suggest it! 

In my defense: I did not say you need to use "sudo".  All you need (at least 
for pyvtk) is privilege to write into /usr/local, so it is more like "rm -rf 
/usr/local" ... still damaging but not as dramatic.  :-)


> If you don't want to maintain it, report RFA or O
> bug or simply remove it from the archive, but never ever suggest users
> to use pip for installing system libs/apps. I had to clean after these
> tools way too many times! pip is great when used inside virtualenv or
> tools like this, but should return "please use rpm/dpkg" whenever
> invoked as root, period!

Thanks.  I had read Paul Tagliamonte's essay [1] and wondered whether I'd get 
this kind of response.  :-)   I won't wade into the debate.

[1] http://notes.pault.ag/debian-python/

Best,
-Steve

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: