Re: Sphinx 1.3 in Debian experimental
- To: debian-python@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Sphinx 1.3 in Debian experimental
- From: Jéremy Bobbio <lunar@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 12:55:25 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20150707105525.GA12657@loar>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-python@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <143560598235.15392.13751484977095371813@mitya57.me>
- References: <20150503121859.8937.76766@mitya57.me> <20150629112336.5dc1961c@anarchist.wooz.org> <143559761231.4966.11184617699117011294@mitya57.me> <CAB4XWXxdtRMY+n9_4svHQU3zjA5jn53Uwa-wz8gi0u9HEo4Dvw@mail.gmail.com> <143559921799.7471.17879392379226439703@mitya57.me> <CAB4XWXx5wNKOuO6CHTFnP=kerbk8=0e-eC2muSX3RFZwrWQ5bw@mail.gmail.com> <143560328778.11699.8467049856626056694@mitya57.me> <CAB4XWXyeafv8eH_COBfQdg+c5sB_6djnk52YLP7Sj-LHSnFPhw@mail.gmail.com> <143560598235.15392.13751484977095371813@mitya57.me>
Dmitry Shachnev:
> Anyway, if you provide a suggestion for how to fix this on Sphinx side
> (not *so* hackish as parsing d/changelog), I will look at it.
Our current proposal is to implement support for the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
environment variable. See:
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsProposal
It's already implemented in help2man, and we have patches ready for
txt2man, epydoc, and Doxygen.
> |today| is for Sphinx the same as __DATE__ is for a C compiler. You do not
> suggest to patch gcc to remove support for __DATE__, do you?
Actually, Dhole implemented a patch to add support for SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH
in GCC and asked upstream what they thought about it:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg02210.html
--
Lunar .''`.
lunar@debian.org : :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism
`. `'`
`-
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: