QA Developer overview, compared with PET

[Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>]

Nicolas Dandrimont <olasd@debian.org> writes:

>  - Dust off the team's PET instance ([1], which looks rather outdated).
> [1] - http://python-modules.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/pet.cgi

I've never seen PET before. It seems redundant with the official QA
Packages Overview tool for each maintainer, which for DPMT is at
<URL:http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org>.

Thanks for bringing PET to my attention. But I wonder whether it's
unused for good reason?

What does PET do which the Packages Overview tool does not? Why advocate PET
rather than advocating for those features to be added to the QA PAckages
Overview tool?

-- 
 \      “It is the integrity of each individual human that is in final |
  `\        examination. On personal integrity hangs humanity's fate.” |
_o__)               —Richard Buckminster Fuller, _Critical Path_, 1981 |
Ben Finney