Re: Embedded six.py in many packages: can someone add a lintian check?
On May 28, 2014, at 05:18 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>To avoid that it grows out of proportion, can someone add a lintian
>check for that? I'd be *very* happy to have this check for myself as
>well, so that I don't miss it once more (it's quite easy to miss...).
Unfortunately, it's not just six that gets vendorized. I'd be in favor of a
lintian check if it could be generalized to warn against all vendorizing. A
warning specifically about six is helpful but limited.
>Also, am I the only one that believe this is a bug, and that we should
>do mass bug-filling?
It's definitely a bug.
-Barry
Reply to: