Re: wheel support for Debian?
Oh my god, I misread this email, Sorry everyone.
Much love,
Paul
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> Doko and I were both in the packaging BOFs while Wheels were discussed
> at PyCon last year (I missed this year, I don't know if doko was there
> this year or not). I wouldn't write Doko off just because he's not
> active on the MLs or in the PEP process.
>
>
> That being said, I like wheelfiles, and I hope we support them, but
> doko's point shouldn't be dismissed like that.
>
> Cheers,
> Paul
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> wrote:
>> Am 19.05.2014 13:19, schrieb Jakub Wilk:
>>> * Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>, 2014-05-19, 12:44:
>>>> we don't unpack jar files either.
>>>
>>> Fortunately, we don't have to mimic all the Java misfeatures.
>>
>> fine, then please come back after changing the policy to ship unpacked .a files.
>> Call it misfeature or not, but I didn't see you involved upstream defining the
>> wheel format. So please either get involved upstream, or stop complaining about
>> these formats, where these are needed in the distribution.
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>>
>> --
>> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-python-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
>> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>> Archive: [🔎] 537B6C55.50103@debian.org">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 537B6C55.50103@debian.org
>>
>
>
>
> --
> All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors.
>
> #define sizeof(x) rand()
> :wq
--
All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors.
#define sizeof(x) rand()
:wq
Reply to: