Re: Indeed, python-concurrent.futures is the same
On 25 January 2014 23:01, Sandro Tosi <morph@debian.org> wrote:
> Sorry, what? and you didn't think to contact me first to almost
> rewrite the package? If there's problems, open bugs. Revert your
> changes or I'll do at the first occasion. and mainly, why don't you go
> away from DPMT once and for all? you're doing more harm than good
> here. you're not welcome here.
Huh? Thomas seemed to be doing the right thing per the DPMT standards
etc; if you don't want the package to be team maintained, perhaps take
it out of team maintenance?
-Rob
Reply to: