Re: usr/bin/ scripts for console_scripts which lead to binaries-have-file-conflict when python 2 + 3
On Mon, Dec 16, 2013 at 14:19:32 +0100, Olivier Berger wrote:
> Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org> writes:
>
> > * Olivier Berger <olivier.berger@telecom-sudparis.eu>, 2013-12-16, 13:24:
> >>- add a python-rdflib-tools package that contains shell scripts of the
> >>form :
> >>
> >> #!/bin/sh
> >>
> >> exec /usr/bin/python -m rdflib.tools.csv2rdf $*
> >
> > I can't see how that's better than a script with #!/usr/bin/python
> > shebang...
> >
>
> Well... it's essentially easier than altering the modules to provide
> them with a sheebang, making them executable and shipping
> symlinks... whose targets wouldn't be the same in the v2 and v3
> package...
>
> >>- make this package depend on python-rdflib | python3-rdflib
> >
> > /usr/bin/python can't use the modules shipped by python3-rdflib.
> >
>
> Ah, thanks for spotting this... I thought it was a bit too easy indeed
> ;)
>
> Hmmm... Maybe this is better :
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> /usr/bin/python3 -c 'import rdflib.tools.csv2rdf' 2>/dev/null
> if [ "$?" = "0" ]
> then
> exec /usr/bin/python3 -m rdflib.tools.csv2rdf $*
> else
> exec /usr/bin/python -m rdflib.tools.csv2rdf $*
> fi
>
> What do you think ?
>
FWIW I think it's terrible and you should just pick one, and ship that.
Cheers,
Julien
--
Julien Cristau <julien.cristau@logilab.fr>
Logilab http://www.logilab.fr/
Informatique scientifique & gestion de connaissances
Reply to: