Re: Inconsistency in source package naming for python modules

To: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Inconsistency in source package naming for python modules
From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 14:57:02 +0800
Message-id: <[🔎] 51DE573E.9060104@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAHXv-MgTOi_L8v6jJDRty3SKdPenb7YH1D_pv6UvcvGQWxjndw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <[🔎] 51DAC5A6.5090104@debian.org> <[🔎] 7346611.zpGeSbo3K4@scott-latitude-e6320> <[🔎] 51DD0631.5000207@debian.org> <[🔎] krjr6p$kmq$1@ger.gmane.org> <[🔎] 51DDBBDB.6070704@debian.org> <[🔎] CAHXv-MgTOi_L8v6jJDRty3SKdPenb7YH1D_pv6UvcvGQWxjndw@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/11/2013 03:59 AM, Bradley M. Froehle wrote:
> I think a recommendation (for new packages) would be helpful, but I'm
> against any source naming requirements or strict rules.

Then we agree! That's all what I'm asking for.

Thomas

Reply to:

References:
- Inconsistency in source package naming for python modules
  - From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Inconsistency in source package naming for python modules
  - From: Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com>
- Re: Inconsistency in source package naming for python modules
  - From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Inconsistency in source package naming for python modules
  - From: Stuart Prescott <stuart@debian.org>
- Re: Inconsistency in source package naming for python modules
  - From: Thomas Goirand <zigo@debian.org>
- Re: Inconsistency in source package naming for python modules
  - From: "Bradley M. Froehle" <brad.froehle@gmail.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Inconsistency in source package naming for python modules
Next by Date: Re: Inconsistency in source package naming for python modules
Previous by thread: Re: Inconsistency in source package naming for python modules
Next by thread: Re: Inconsistency in source package naming for python modules
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread